Political Processes

MJUSD
DIVISION 1000
COMMUNITY RELATIONS

POLITICAL PROCESSES

The Governing Board has a responsibility to actively advocate fiscal and public policy that supports the District's schools and the children in the community. To the extent possible, the Board shall be proactive in defining the District's advocacy agenda based on the needs of the District and the direction set forth in the District's vision and goals.

The Board may establish reasonable regulations related to Board members and employees engaging in political activity during working hours and on District premises. (Education Code 7055)

Legislation
The Board's responsibility as an advocate for the District may include lobbying at the state and national levels.

Because local governments also make decisions which impact the District's schools, the Board and the Superintendent or designee shall work to establish ongoing relationships with city and county officials and agencies, and shall inform them of the potential effect of local issues on the schools.

The Board shall identify issues that will affect its schools and the children in its community, establish goals and priorities for legislative advocacy, solicit community input and adopt legislative positions. The Superintendent or designee shall establish a coordinated plan for carrying out the advocacy agenda, including specific activities, target groups or individuals, staff responsibilities and timelines.

In order to strengthen legislative advocacy efforts, the District may work with organizations and coalitions and may join associations whose representatives lobby on behalf of their members.

As necessary, the Superintendent or designee may draft legislative proposals which serve the District's interests.

The Board may provide fair and impartial information about legislative issues affecting schools and children and shall inform the community about its legislative advocacy activities. However, the Board shall not urge the public to lobby the legislative on behalf of the District.

Ballot Measures/Candidates
The Board may study the potential effect of ballot measures on the District's schools. Any Board discussion of the effect of such measures shall include an opportunity for Board members, staff and members of the public to speak on all sides of the issue. Following such study, the Board may adopt positions in support of or in opposition to ballot measures of importance to education.

The Board's positions shall be publicized only through normal District procedures for reporting Board action and in a manner that does not attempt to influence voters.

No District funds, services, supplies or equipment shall be used to urge the support or defeat of any ballot measure or candidate, including any candidate for election to the Board. (Education Code 7054)

District resources shall not be used to disseminate campaign literature or to purchase advertisements, bumper stickers, posters or similar promotional items that advocate an election result.

The Superintendent or designee may use District resources to provide students, parents/guardians and community members with fair and impartial information related to ballot measures, including information about the impact of ballot measures on the District. (Education Code 7054)

In preparing or distributing such information, the Superintendent or designee shall ensure that the totality of the circumstances, including language, style, tenor and timing, does not expressly advocate passage or defeat of a measure or candidate.

The Superintendent or designee may research, draft and prepare a bond measure or other initiative for the ballot, but shall not use the District resources to secure signatures in order to qualify the measure for the ballot.

Upon request, Board members and District administrators may appear at any time before a citizens' group to explain why the Board called for an election on a bond measure and to answer questions. (Education Code 7054.1)

If the presentation occurs during working hours, the District representative shall not urge a citizens' group to vote for or against the bond measure.

Legal Advocacy
The Board recognizes that some issues are more appropriately addressed judicially rather than legislatively. When a legal issue is likely to set a state or national precedent, the District may join with other Districts or parties in order to challenge the issue through litigation or other appropriate means.

Political Forums
Forums on political issues may be held in District facilities as long as the forum is made available to all sides of the issue on an equitable basis. (Education Code 7058)

Legal Reference:

Education Code
7054 Use of district property
7054.1 Appearance of officer or board member before citizens' group
7055 Local agency rules
7056 Soliciting or receiving political funds
7058 Use of forum under control of board
35160 Authority of governing boards
35172 Promotional activities

Government Code
50023 Attending legislature to support or oppose legislation
53060.5 Attendance at legislative body; expenses
54953.5 Right to record proceedings
54953.6 Broadcasts of proceedings
81000-91015 Political Reform Act

Court Decisions
Stanson v. Mott, (1976) 17 Cal.3d 206
Miller v. Miller, (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 762
League of Women Voters v. Countrywide Criminal Justice Coordination Committee, (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 529,
250 Cal.Rptr. 161, rev.den.
Choice-in-Education League et al v. Los Angeles Unified School District, (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 415
Yes on Measure A v. City of Lake Forest, (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 620
Scherer v. Buchanan, First Appellate District, Civil No. A076648

Attorney General Opinions
73 Ops.Cal.Att.Gen. 255 (1990)

First Reading: 10/11/00

Governing Board Adoption: 11/8/00

Website by SchoolMessenger Presence. © 2022 Intrado Corporation. All rights reserved.